- Flynote
-
Criminal law and procedure – application for reconsideration of order
refusing special leave – whether evidence of single witness passed muster – failure by the prosecution to call crucial witness – whether such failure warranted drawing of adverse inference – whether magistrate erred in not allowing cross-examination of the complainant in terms of s 227 of the Criminal Procedure Act 51 of 1977.
Loading PDF...
This document is 193.7 KB. Do you want to load it?
Cited documents 10
Judgment 7
1. | Smith v S (475/2010) [2011] ZASCA 15 (15 March 2011) | 74 citations |
2. | Mashongwa v PRASA [2015] ZACC 36 (26 November 2015) | 51 citations |
3. | S v Matshona (509/2007) [2008] ZASCA 58 (28 May 2008) | 23 citations |
4. | S Liesching and Others [2018] ZACC 25 (29 August 2018) | 18 citations |
5. | Avnit v First Rand Bank Ltd (20233/2014) [2014] ZASCA 132 (23 September 2014) | 17 citations |
6. | Liesching and Others v S and Another [2016] ZACC 41 (15 November 2016) | 17 citations |
7. | Manyike v S (527 of 2017) [2017] ZASCA 96 (15 June 2017) | 4 citations |
Legislation 3
1. | Criminal Procedure Act, 1977 | 3916 citations |
2. | Superior Courts Act, 2013 | 1696 citations |
3. | Criminal Law (Sexual Offences and Related Matters) Amendment Act, 2007 | 445 citations |
Documents citing this one 2
Judgment 2
1. | Baisley v S (Appeal) (CA & R 244/2022) [2024] ZAECGHC 37 (28 March 2024) | |
2. | S v Khoza (A222/2022) [2023] ZAGPPHC 1026 (8 September 2023) |